|
Divrei Torah:
First Day of Pesach
Shabbat Chol Hamoed
Shvii Shel Pesach
Acharon Shel Pesach
Parshat Shemini
First Day of Pesach
15 Nissan 5766
April 13, 2006
Daf Yomi: Pesachim 86
Guest Rabbi:
Rabbi Moshe S. Gorelik
Rabbi Emeritus, Young Israel of North Bellmore, NY
This Dvar Torah will focus on the
religious message implied by the Hagada's definition of the chacham
– the wise son. The author of the Hagada contrasts the first two
sons by referring to one as the chacham and the second one as the
rasha – the wicked son. In the tradition of the Tanach style, one
would expect the contractst to be phrased tzadik – the righteous
son, and rasha. Chacham and rasha refer to different and unrelated
categories of people. Chacham defines the level of intelligence of a
person. Rasha on the other hand, defines a moral character.
This seemingly incongruous formulation
was addressed by Rav Moshe Avigdor Amiel, z"tl, the former Chief
Rabbi of Tel Aviv and author of classical works on Halacha and Agada.
He added a significant dimension to the definition of chacham. The
ideal tzadik is both righteous and wise. This model personifies the
integration of noble attributes of righteousness and philosophic
curiosity.
Thus, the two terms tzadik and chacham
conjure up different categories of people. Tzadik bespeaks of
meticulous religious behavior, moral character, devotion to HaShem,
and ethical obligation to fellow human beings. Chacham, on the other
hand, is a lover of wisdom. The chacham raises questions and seeks
intelligent and logical answers. In the Hagada, the term chacham
acquires an additional dimension when it is contrasted with rasha.
In other words, the chacham is the tzadik whose religious commitment
and religious experience are grounded in reason and intelligence.
Rav Amiel's definition is far-reaching, that is, piety requires
intelligence. Religious faith and commitment to Torah morality
demands understanding and clear thinking.
If intellectual curiosity is discouraged
or disapproved, religious observances will fail to convey the
richness and depth of their meaning. Since it lacks the enriching
spiritual quality, rote learning is unexciting and uninspirational.
It falls short in igniting the neshama and lighting up religious
enthusiasm.
The Talmud declared that, in the future
life, at the time of judgement, a person will be asked a series of
questions. The first question will be, "Have you dealt honestly (b'emuna)
in business?"
A Chassidic master pointed to an
alternate interpretation. He translated emuna as "faith" rather than
"honesty." The complete phrase is, thusly, translated "have you
grappled (i.e. philosophically) with your faith?" One must come
face-to-face with the spiritual and moral challenges; shying away
from the issues is not an enduring solution. They will ultimately
come to haunt us. Thus, the Chassidic master and Rav Amiel,
apparently agree, that to be a tzadik, one must be a chacham.
During the past year, rabbis, communal
leaders, and educators have been coming to grips with a growing
phenomenon in our educational institutions. A number of students,
male and female, are being turned off and are compromising religious
behavior. One popular Orthodox journal devoted an entire issue to
the problems. The writers tackled the problems through different
lenses including psychological, religious, and educational
perspectives. For a long time, this developing trend was recognized,
but the leadership did not pay adequate attention because the
institutions were immensely and overwhelmingly successful with the
bulk of the student body. Some even advised not to stir up a hornets
nest and the hope persisted that the hornets will fly away. Not only
has the hope not been realized, the hornets population increased.
Undoubtedly several factors contributed
to this critical problem. The culture of the day is do your own
thing, or to do what makes you happy. Also, the media glorifies the
hedonistic extravaganza of American society. Unsettling family life
may affect the emotional stability of the young students or,
perhaps, an incompetent rebbe has impacted negatively on the
student.
In addition to the forgoing causes,
there may be a need to reassess the educational philosophy: Does the
learning relate to the reality of life? Does learning stimulate the
mind and impassion the heart? There are two categories of learning
or knowledge. Namely, passive and active. Passive knowledge
signifies absorption of facts and figures, learning and textual
skills, and memorization of materials. However, a student may fail
to see the relevance of such knowledge to current human conditions.
The student may then equate his years of study to an exercise
routine in a mental gym.
Active knowledge is a pursuit of reason.
The student is encouraged to delve into the corpus of our mesora
with an inquiring mind, and is encouraged to ask questions in the
spirit of the Chassidic master's attitude. A hashkafa of yahadut
that is deeply rooted in the bedrock of Torah philosophy that does
not rule out grappling with current cultural challenges will
convince the student that Torah is an Eitz HaChaim, a Tree of Life.
Furthermore, such a Hashkafa will equip the student with the
intellectual wherewithal to avoid the pitfalls of contemporary
values. Rav Amiel was correct. To be a tzadik, one must be a chacham.
The Chiddushei Harim commenting on the
pasuk "Understand the years of every generation" (Dvarim 32:7)
declared the following: "In every generation and in every period,
there comes from the Heavens a new understanding of the Torah, one
which is appropriate for the generation. The tzadikim in each
generation understand the Torah according to what is needed to teach
the people of the generation."
Rav Amital, Rosh HaYeshiva of Yeshivat
Har Etzion, added an enlightening footnote to the remarkable
statements of the Chiddushei Harim. In order for these leaders to
struggle and contemplate until they arrive at a new understanding,
it is imperative for them to be challenged by their generation's
problems and questions. Only questions will give rise to answers. If
the generations do not raise questions, the leaders will not come up
with the solutions.
In light of the above discussion, it is
crucial that communal leaders and educators possess the courage and
determination to assess and reassess the strengths and weaknesses of
the educational programs. Are we imparting passive knowledge or
active knowledge? The Chiddushei Harim was very wise. One may not
rest on past laurels. We are charged to confront the questions of
each age and provide the answers appropriate for the generation to
achieve the goal. He was right. To be a tzadik, one must be a
chacham.
Shabbat
Chol Hamoed Pesach
17 Nissan 5766 April
15, 2006
2 Omer
Daf Yomi: Pesachim 88
Guest Rabbi:
Rabbi Adam
Miller, Psy.D.
Associate Member, Young
Israel Council of Rabbis
Every sefer found in what we
call Tanach underwent a process of canonization. The
only scriptures that were canonized were those that had
some moral or halachic value for posterity, "nitzricha
lidorot". However, there was fierce opposition to the
inclusion of Shir HaShirim in Tanach. On a superficial
level, Shir HaShirim is an account of the romantic and
even erotic experience shared between a man and a woman.
While this pierce of poetic prose does describe this
part of the human condition in graphic detail, the
edifying potential of the work for the reader can be
questioned. To further the contention of the opposition,
the name of HaKadosh Baruch Hu does not appear once,
neither explicitly nor implicitly (unlike Megilat
Esther), throughout the entire Shir HaShirim.
The Mishna in Yadayim (3:5)
records a dispute among the Tanaim, as to whether one's
unwashed hands can contract tuma by touching the letters
or the klaf (parchment) on which Shir HaShirim is
written. Rabbi Akiva rules in the affirmative, stating,
"shekol haketuvim kodesh, veShir Hashirim kodesh
kodoshim, "all scriptures are holy, but Shir HaShirim is
the holiest". What is so holy about Shir HaShirim?
The standard answer offered
assumes that the words of Shir HaShirim may not be taken
literally. Metaphorically, the love described therein
refers to the intense love that exists between HaKadosh
Baruch Hu and Kneset Yisrael- the Jewish nation. In
countless midrashim, Chazal expound on this beautiful
metaphor, in all its intricate facets. One walks away
from reading Shir HaShirim with the realization that
there is virtually nothing about the close personal
relationship we share with HaShem that is not expressed
in Shir HaShirim. In a sense, the holiness of Shir
HaShirim relates directly to the exclusive intimacy that
the Jewish people enjoys with HaShem.
Nevertheless, it is still
difficult to understand why Chazal would enjoin us to
read Shir HaShirim during Pesach, and among Ashkenazim,
on Shabbat Chol HaMoed Pesach as part of the services.
In the Jewish tradition, what is most holy and sublime
is concealed. For example, we do not advocate for the
public teaching of the Kabbala or of other hidden works,
simply because of the tremendous potential for the
masses to misconstrue the true intent of what is being
taught. It is also partly for this reason that the
halachot pertaining to forbidden sexual relationships
are not to be taught in groups consisting of three
individuals (Mishna Chagiga 2:1).
There is something unique
about Shir HaShirim, in contrast to other "restricted
scripture" that necessitates its reading in public, and
more specifically on Shabbat Chol HaMoed Pesach.
According to the Zohar (Truma 143), the thematic content
of Shir HaShirim illuminates a basic tenet of Judaism:
the redemption of the Jewish people from Mitzrayim, as
well as our trust in the ultimate redemption in the
future. The Zohar is not just referring to a literal
form of physical redemption from exile; it is an
elaborate explanation of how we are to redeem ourselves
from a spiritual abyss. A Jew takes the most base of all
instincts, that of unbridled libido, and elevates it to
kedusha in the service of the Divine. This can only be
accomplished when reading beneath the surface. The
challenge we have is how we will perceive Shir HaShirim:
a book of Biblical love poetry or a work that surmises
the closeness felt by Kneset Yisrael when in the
presence of HaKadosh Baruch Hu. There is nothing out of
the purview of Judaism. The halachot of intimacy are
found in the same Shulchan Aruch as those pertaining to
kashrut and shmirat Shabbat. In fact, one cannot become
a complete servant of HaShem without using all of one's
faculties in serving Him.
Yetziat Mitzrayim was not
just about HaShem freeing a downtrodden nation from the
shackles of slavery; most importantly it was about
releasing a nation steeped in the immorality and
depravity of Mitzrayim so that they could actualize
their mission as those chosen to set the moral standard
for humankind. "Avadim hayinu lePharoh beMitzrayim", "we
were slaves to the Pharaoh in Mitzrayim" but no more. As
servants of HaShem, we are bidden to subjugate our dark
side to the will of HaShem (see Avot 2:4) and by doing
so we elevate ourselves and our contacts to a higher
spiritual and more meaningful existence.
In a similar vein, when one
observes Shabbat in its proper spirit, he takes what can
be an ordinary day and elevates it to kedusha, not only
by refraining from melacha, but by taking delight in the
material side of Shabbat. The choicest foods are
reserved for Shabbat, the coveted afternoon nap is
designated for the one day of the week that we should
feel connected to HaShem. Yet, this relationship can be
deepened through living in the material world HaShem
created and to fuse it with the spiritual.
How appropriate it is to
read Shir HaShirim written by the wisest of all men for
the spiritually minded materially grounded individual.
On this holiday in which we celebrate the beloved
relationship of Kneset Yisrael and HaKadosh Baruch Hu,
let us turn to Him as we recall the physical and
spiritual redemption of the past while eagerly awaiting
our own redemption in the future.
Shvii Shel Pesach
21 Nissan 5766 April
19, 2006
6 Omer
Daf Yomi: Pesachim
92
Guest Rabbi:
Rabbi
Elimelech Goldberg
Associate Member, Young Israel Council of Rabbis
Lzeicher nishmas Yosef Chaim
ben Michoel Dovid Halevi
The holiday of Pesach begins
with the mitzva of the seder whose initial questions,
recited by the youngest child, introduce an entire
evening of response. Those four questions quickly become
a highlight of the seder and the opening salvo in
keeping the younger members of the household alert
throughout the night's activity. The Abarbanel cleverly
points out that there are, in fact, five questions, the
first being, "Why is this night different from all other
nights." However, in reality, he continues, all of the
four are a variation of the first and there is but one
question with four parts.
It is not unusual for Jews
to do unusual things. Yet, we never stop to question in
such a prescribed ritual manner, why we sit in a sukka,
take the four species, sound a shofar, etc. The fier
kashas - four questions, are predicated upon the fact
that the seder is different. What makes this experience
such an anomaly is the dual almost contradictory aspect
of the mitzvot. We certainly understand that the Jewish
calendar demands from us to commemorate the experiences
of mourning and despair that are represented in the
eating of the bread of affliction and the portion of
bitter herbs. Likewise, we are well aware that there are
holidays dedicated to the joyous expression of
thanksgiving. Therefore, it is quite reasonable to be
dipping our foods as the wealthy do or reclining in the
manner of the free. "Why is this night different from
all other nights", is the question that demands, why on
the very same night are we experiencing the bitter and
the sweet, the blessings and the hardships, together. It
is the paradox of the seder that elicits this one
forceful question.
Even as the night concludes,
have we ever come around to really answering the child's
question. While it is true that we describe the evening
of exodus as a dual night of slavery and oppression as
well as freedom and redemption, the underlying riddle
remains. Why is it, that HaShem chooses to mix together
the bitter and the sweet? Why are our lives not easier?
If there is going to be a redemption, let it be a night
of total celebration, not divided at "Chatzot" between
the boundaries of suffering and rejoicing. Perhaps, we
only get to the real answer on the seventh day of
Pesach, where, in the Song of the Sea, the question
again reappears.
Reading the Shirat HaYam is
an interesting exercise in the non-sequitor. "Then Moshe
and Bnei Yisrael sang this song." Why then? The song
begins with a rather vivid description of the drowning
of the Egyptians. "Horse and rider He drowned in the
sea." Yet, Pharoah's army would not have ventured into
those waters had the Holy One not parted the Yam Suf to
make room for the Jewish People's escape. Why do we
begin this song with the description of the drowning of
the Egyptians only to go backwards to detail how
HaKadosh Baruch Hu turned the raging sea into heaps of
tamed water? Why weren't the Jews immediately responsive
to the first part of the miracle, the actual splitting
of the Sea and sing their song as they were marching
through?
When Cecil B. Demills shot
his epoch version of the Ten Commandments (well after it
came out in book form) he had two gigantic conduits rush
water towards each other from opposing sides of a large
valley. He then showed that film backwards.
HaShem Yitbarach, however,
relied on no gimmicks. The waters, rather than merely
receding, piled up into enormous walls on both sides,
providing a twelve lane highway for the Jewish People to
walk through. Miraculously, those waters remained
towering over the fleeing Nation. Can one imagine what
it must have felt like to stand beneath a wall of water?
Every ounce of their intuition and experience told Bnai
Yisrael that the water above should be raining down
destruction upon their very heads. For most, that
journey must have felt awesome in thanksgiving to HaShem
but also uncomfortable in the reality of their hard to
accept situation. "Thank you G-d, for this enormous nes,
miracle, but would it be possible to move it a couple of
miles upstream?" It did not make sense that the exodus,
so long awaited for, should be this frightening. It was
not yet time for shira.
"And then Moshe and the
Jewish People sang". It was only after they experienced
the destruction of the pursuing Egyptian Army that it
all the pieces fit together. "Then", it all made sense.
The entire process had been part of the Al-Mighty's
plan. We, who walked beneath the shadows of the towering
waters could not comprehend the magnificent picture that
emerged from this puzzle, until we got to the other
side. Then, it made sense. Then, we sang.
On the seventh day of
Pesach, after we have gone through the enormous task of
preparing ourselves for the Yom Tov, after we have
experienced the long Pesach night, we are ready to
re-approach the underlying question of the four kashas.
Why is it that we need to commemorate the suffering and
the liberation together? Why does the cycle of life
merge the bitter and the sweet? The answer from the sea
washes up on the distant shores during today's kria. "On
that day, HaShem will be One and His name will be One."
When we observe the last piece of His puzzle come into
place, then we will be able to realize that each and
every part of our personal and national history forges
into one complete picture, the Oneness of HaShem. Every
pain and every cry, every song and every laugh, together
compose the essential ingredients of our soul necessary
for us to arrive at that other side.
For not to know the darkness
of slavery is never to appreciate the light of freedom.
Not to touch death is never to appreciate life. It is
the journey that is important. Chazal describe that the
walls of water, so frightening to so many, offered
delicious fruits and foods for the picking. There are
many people who avail themselves of the incredible
blessings of growth and life, even in the midst of some
difficult travels. There are others who will only
comprehend the complete answer when they get to the
other side. As I write this, I have just learned of the
death of another one of our Camp Simcha children, a
young boy from Richmond, Virginia. This is the fifth
child that I have known, who passed away, in as many
weeks. Yossi would have been Bar Mitzva next month. He
was everything that one can ask for in a young, sweet
ben Torah. His mother, maintained a web page (www.geocities.com/mugsisme/yossi.html)
, that chronicled Yossi's struggle through his two bone
marrow transplants and finally, his death. Yossi's life
was so filled with the precious loving light of joy and
so racked by burdensome disease and pain. But read the
words of this incredible mother. Even now, as her son
stands on the other side, her writing is filled with the
love of HaShem and the appreciation to the Jewish
communities, at home and at the transplant center who
offered support. It is not that she loves her Yossi any
less. It is that we, as a People, love our Creator with
a love that is greater than all of all of the pains and
trepidations that are part of the puzzle of this world.
This is the love that we read about in the words of the
Shir Hashirim. It is a love that assures us, that no
matter how difficult the journey, we never travel alone.
Each step, no matter how vast and painful is part of His
plan. This is the Song of the Sea and the Song of Songs.
It is the music that accompanies the historical march of
the Jewish People. It is our shira, the triumphant
liturgy of the end of Pesach that explains the
unexplainable of its beginning.
Acharon Shel Pesach
22 Nissan 5766 April
20, 2006
7 Omer
Daf Yomi: Pesachim
93
By:
Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, zt"l
translated by Rabbi Bezalel Naor
It is well known
that we Jews do not gloat over the punishments
visited on the Egyptians. The Talmud relates
that at the time of the Splitting of the Reed
Sea, the ministering angels started to sing
praise to the L-rd. The Al-Mighty rebuked them:
"My handiwork are drowning in the sea and you
recite song?!" (Megilla 10b). Rav Kook takes
this thinking a step further. He is bothered by
the following problem.
There is a Talmudic
principle that a truly righteous person must see
to it that he is not the cause of a wicked
person's being punished. The verse, "Also, to
punish the righteous is not good," was
interpreted by the rabbis, "Also, to punish for
the righteous is not good." (Proverbs 17:26;
Brachot 7a; Shabbat 149b). Furthermore, in cases
where the zaddik had in fact been the cause of a
wicked person being punished, the zaddik is
deprived of the divine presence. "Whose
companion is punished on his account, is not
admitted to the divine presence." (Ibid).
Neither do the rabbis differentiate in this
regard between wicked Jews and wicked non-Jews;
in neither case should the righteous be the
cause of punishment. (See Tosafot, Brachot 7a,
s.v. hahu zadduki, and Shabbat, ibid, concerning
Nebuchadnezzar.)
How then, asks
Rav Kook, could the Jews, who clearly were the
cause of the Egyptions' being smitten, have
enjoyed basking in the divine radiance?! Rav
Kook quotes the Mechilta to the effect that the
lintel and two doorposts of the Israelites, upon
which were smeared the blood of the paschal
lamb, were accorded the status of a holy place.
"Our forefathers had three altars: The lintel
and the two doorposts." (Mechilta, Bo, parasha
11. Cf. Psachim 96a). That same night the
firstborn of Egypt were being smitten, the Jews
were enjoying a state of utter sanctity. How is
that possible?
More basic, Rav Kook
attempts to understand why the smiting of the
firstborn of Egypt was, so to speak, the "grand
finale" of the ten plagues. What is so
significant about this specific plague?
The key to
understanding all of the above, is the fact that
at this time, G-d speaks of the Jewish People as
"My firstborn son, Israel" (Exodus 4:22). G-d is
removed from all anthropomorphism, so in what
sense is Israel His firstborn son?
Before the sin of
the Golden Calf, the firstborn were designated
to serve as priests. After the sin of the Golden
Calf, the role was transferred to the Levites.
When G-d refers to Israel as His firstborn son,
the implicit meaning is that the Jewish People
is to act as "a kingdom of priests, "to teach
the other nations of the world the ways of G-d.
(Cf. Rabbi Abraham Maimonides, Commentary to
Exodus 19:6, citing his illustrious father.) The
firstborn acts as an educator to his younger
brothers.
Because of this
relationship that exists between Israel and the
nations of the world, an injustice committed
against Israel is not merely a sin against a
particular nation, but rather an injustice to
the entire world. In hurting Israel, a nation
hurts itself as well. (Just as when one hurts
one's teacher, one suffers oneself.)
The Egyptians were
not punished because of their affliction of the
Hebrews, but rather because of the damage they
did to the entire world. If in truth, the
punishment of the Egyptian firstborn were on
account of Israel, then it would not have been
possible for Israel at that very moment to
benefit from the divine presence. The fact that
Israel was so privileged, meant that the
Egyptian firstborn were smitten for some other
reason. Their suffering was the result of
Israel's status as "firstborn son," which is to
say priest-teacher to the world.
"You shall say to
Pharaoh, Thus said the Lord, My firstborn son is
Israel. And I said unto you, let My son go, that
he may serve Me, and you refused to let him go;
so, behold, I am slaying your firstborn son."
(Exodus 4:22,23)
The Gaon Rav Avraham
Yitzhak HaKohen Kook zt"l (1865-1935) was the
first Ashkenazic chief rabbi of Eretz Israel. He
is most famous today for his pioneering work at
outreach to alienated secular Israelis. This
excerpt is taken from the recently published
work, In the Desert-A Vision: Rabbi Abraham
Isaac Kook on the Torah Portion of the Week (Orot,
2000). These Torah gems were adapted from Rav
Kook's just discovered manuscript Midbar Shur by
Rabbi Bezalel Naor. The book is available at
Jewish bookstores or directly from the
publisher: info@orot.com. Tel/fax (845)
352-2405.
Parshat Shemini
24 Nissan 5766 April
22, 2006
9 Omer
Daf Yomi: Pesachim
95
Guest Rabbi:
Rabbi Chaim Landau
Associate
Member, Young Israel Council of Rabbis
Imagine that someone
comes to you and informs you that had you
purchased a lottery ticket that day, you would
have been the recipient of a fortune…the stuff
of dreams. However, since that was the farthest
thing from your mind at the time, you would
probably just add it up to another dream that
will go the way of fantacised memories.
Nothing
purchased…nothing lost.
Now imagine that you
had purchased the winning ticket, and for seven
days you tasted the fantasy of wealth, power,
pleasure…..only for the authorities to tell you
that there had been a horrible mistake. You
hadn’t really purchased the winning ticket, and,
assuming you had not spent the entire sum of
your winnings, you now had to return the rest of
the money. Having experienced the world of
unlimited affluence, the loss of this world
cannot be easily forgotten as you contemplate
the might-have-been’s of your new-found wealth.
And so we turn to
the beginning of Parshat Shemini with its
seemingly innocuous, vacuous dating of the time
Aaron becomes the Cohen Gadol. “Vaye’hi Ba-yom
Hash-mini”…it was on the eighth day…..But the
eighth day of what, from what, to what ? Not
exactly the kind of exactness we normally see in
the Torah, especially when relating to important
events and happenings: no number of month, no
date of the month. Very strange.
In fact, respond the
Sages, this matter is the subject of a differnce
of opinion. There are those who say we are
discussing the 1st Nisan, while others hold that
we are really talking about the 8th Nisan.
But why should the
parshah have began in such a strange fashion ?
Have in mind that for seven days, Moshe Rabbenu
has been officiating as the Cohen Gadol thus
far, and it is only now, on the eighth day that
he divests himself from office while investing
his brother into the position of Cohen Gadol.
Backtrack to the
events of the burning bush at which time Gd
tells Moshe to prepare himself for the position
of Cohen Gadol and leadership, and Moshe argues
against the idea. In fact, we are told that this
dialogue continued for seven days. G-d becomes
angry with Moshe and informs him that he will
then have to choose Aaron for the spiritual role
of leadership.
For the seven days
that Moshe argued with G-d, he was punished –
not with having the position of Cohen Gadol with
drawn from him instantly, but tasting the
position himself for seven days, and then having
to step down on the eighth day, handing over the
role to his brother. For doesn’t that make a
bigger impression of a loss, for you can only
really feel the loss of something or someone
special once you have experienced and tasted the
relationship. If this chance never arises, then
it just remains within the possibility of
might-have-beens, but no sleep is really lost
over it.
This idea is given
greater credence in the Pirkei Avot, where we
are told that for certain sins…”motzi’in et
ha’adam min ha’alom”…we take a person out of the
world. Say the commentaries, this is to be
understood that the world being discussed is
Olam Habo, and that such a sinner is given the
opportunity of tasting Olam Habo for a short
period of time, with all of its beauty and
grandeur…only then to be taken out of it, so
that he will eternally pine for the world that
could have been his, if only…..Because tasting
such an experience creates the relationship of
loss.
I think that we all
have our eighth days – our opportunities to
excel and reach our goals, for it is only when
we don’t, and having smelt the potential for
such invaluable heights that we can only then
truly understand what we have lost. And so let’s
hope that all our “Bayom hash’mini’s” will be
blessed with success so that we will all reach,
maintain and keep those relationships in our
lives that we have worked so hard to establish,
and enjoyed for too long to sacrifice.
Shabbat Shalom.
NCYI's Weekly Divrei Torah Bulletin is
sponsored by
the Henry, Bertha and Edward Rothman Foundation -
Rochester, New York; Cleveland, Ohio; Circleville, Ohio
To receive a free e-mail subscription to NCYI’s weekly
Torah Bulletin, send an email to:
YI_Torah@lb.bcentral.com
|