“New Balance Seekers”
The German philosopher Georg Hegel
maintained that progress in human thought invariably follows the
path of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Every idea is first
challenged by a counter-idea, until the common elements of these two
finally find reconciliation in a third and grander idea.
While much of Hegel’s philosophy may be
at odds with Torah ideology, this notion of his is not without
parallel in Jewish thought and, I believe, it plays an important
role in this week’s Torah portion.
There is a striking resemblance between
the opening and closing sections of this week’s reading. The first
section of Parshas Chukas is about “when a man shall die in the
tent” (19:14), and the closing episode of Parshas Balak involves the
slaying of two sinners “in the tent” (25:8).
But the similarity is deeper than that.
Parshas Chukas begins with the Parah
Adumah (red hefer) purification ritual. Although the true meaning of
this mitzvah is ultimately elusive, the Commentators do present
symbolisms and lessons we can draw from it. The Sforno (19:2) shows
a recurring theme in the Parah Adumah’s components. The wood from a
mighty cedar tree symbolizes arrogance, the lowly hyssop, humility,
and the crimson thread, sin (as red is always the symbol of sin).
Thus the combination of these three in the Parah Adumah’s pyre
teaches that either extreme – excessive pride or excessive humility
— is a sin. Only the balance between the two is appropriate.
The sprinkling of the hefer’s ashes
together with water further indicates that it is not ash (the
ultimate symbol of fire’s devastation), nor water (the exact
opposite force), but their combination that is sought. The recurring
lesson of the Parah Adumah is thus: neither extreme is of value if
not tempered by its opposite. Indeed, this is a central motif in
Parshas Balak, as well. The Gemora (Brachos 7a) teaches us that
there is a milisecond of Divine wrath every day. Balak knew how to
calculate that moment, and he was going to use it to curse the
Jewish People. The result of this could have been catastrophic. To
foil his plan, the Ribbono Shel Olam refrained entirely from
becoming angry during the days of Balak’s attempted curses. Some of
the Commentators explain (I believe I first heard this insight in
the name of Rav Are’le Belzer, but have seen similar explanations in
the name of others since) that the function of the momentary Divine
anger is to imbue the world with a sense of absolute justice and
intolerance for what is wrong. Although for the most part we must be
tolerant and patient in order to countenance what is incorrect,
there is a need for some degree of absolute, unbending truth. The
one moment of Hashem’s anger is to instill a small dose of absolute
truth and intolerance for falsehood within Klal Yisroel.
Since G-d refrained from anger
altogether during this time, this sense of truth was somewhat
lacking from the world and there was a greater aura of love and
acceptance, untempered by principled fairness. This is what led to
the episode immediately following Balaam’s departure: And the
[Jewish] People began to sin with the daughters of Moav (25:1).
Kindness that is not kept in balance by a strong sense of propriety
and boundaries leads to excessive closeness and, as it were,
licentious behavior. (Compare Kedoshim 20:17, where an act of incest
is described as “chessed.”)
It was therefore only through the act of
Pinchas at the end of the parsha that balance was restored to the
Jewish Nation. Pinchas, who on the one hand is described as Aharon
HaKohen’s grandson – Aharon the great lover of peace – performs the
courageous act of a zealot, showing total intolerance for
immorality, and the proper balance between love and morality is
restored.
The Rambam teaches us that in order to
correct a negative behavior, we must compensate to the extreme and
behave in the exact opposite way. But ultimately, of course, the
goal is to return to the proper equilibrium (See Shemone Perakim,
chapter 4). Humanity has historically had a hard time with balance.
People tend to be either exceedingly pleasure-seeking or exceedingly
austere, fanatically controlling or anarchistic. But as committed
Jews and adherents to the Torah we have the imperative to seek to
master our middos and find the ultimate balance. It is this
synthesis that brings sanctity and blessing to our lives.
Shabbat Shalom!