Search YoungIsrael.org for:

Today is Tuesday, May 22, 2012



Young Israel Weekly Dvar Torah



 

Parshat Lech Lecha
13 Cheshvan 5764
November 8, 2003

Daf Yomi: Menachos 33


Guest Author:
Rabbi Chaim Landau

Associate Member, YICR

 

Before there was ever an Intifada, and a sustained campaign of vicious and brutal terrorism aimed against the Israeli citizenry to scare them out of Israel and to attempt to extract the land out of their hands and into those of the Palestinians', the following fascinating rabbinic argument evolved: which mitzvah dominates and takes precedence - that of honouring parents or that of mitzvat aliyat le-aretz. In other words, prior to the current attempt of bombing the Jews out of Israel came the discussion as to whether we should be even going to Eretz Yisrael when it conflicted with the mitzvah of honouring one's parents who, living in the Diaspora, refuse the child the right to go there.


This discussion begins with the opening words of our parshah, Lech Lechah, to which the Panim Yafos quotes a Midrash explaining why the word Lechah had to be included in the Divine order to Avraham. Responds the Midrash as follows: The dispensation to leave your family and continue your journey to Eretz Yisrael applies only to you, Avraham, thus overruling the otherwise ongoing mitzvah of Kibud Av. So what is clearly being learnt from this Midrash is that when parents live in the Diaspora and children wish to leave for Israel, the parents may refuse them this wish, and the children must abide by the parents' requests.


But then, why for Avraham was the conflict resolved to his benefit? Responds the Panim Yafos by saying that Terach's status in the world as an evil person made him unworthy to have the mitzvah of Kibud Av apply to him, and so Avraham did not have this conflict and could proceded to Israel without any twinge of conscience. But for everyone else, such a conflict would have to be resolved to the benefit of the parent in following the mitzvah of Kibud Av.


Is this such an obvious resolution that we had to learn the outcome from Avraham? The difficulty here is created by a rabbinic discussion in the Masechet of Yevamot whereby if a father orders his son, a Cohen, to make himself unclean (tamei), or orders his son not to return a lost object...what takes precedence? Father's orders or the Torah's dictates? The concept here is whether a parent can order a child to contravene a mitzvah from the Torah and still rely on his own mitzvah of Kibud. The paradigm here is that when a parent insists that his child desecrate Shabbat, the child should disobey the parent and obey G-d, for when it comes to mitzvot in general, ultimately, we all owe allegiance to G-d's Torah, and so G-d's overriding precedence overrules any conflicting parental decrees.


In our case under discussion, the paradigm seems to have been extended into our current conflict: the child wishes to fulfill the mitzvah of Aliyah over the parents' desires to have the child remain with them in the Diaspora. However, the Midrash teaches that this matter was resolved only in Avraham's favour, and that, for all of us, we would be dutybound to follow honouring our parents.


Support for this opinion is also found in a sefer penned by the Chochmas Adam, entitled Shaar Mishpetei Ha'Aretz who also adds the following proof: everyone knows that Yaakov was punished for having stayed away from his father for 22 years preventing him from fulfilling the mitzvah of Kibud Av by having his own son Yosef copy his actions. But why doesn't anyone say that Yaakov was punished for having remained outside of Israel for 22 years? Responds the Chochmas Adam that since Yaakov transgressed these two mitzvot at the same time (failing to honour his parent and not having made the mitzvah of Aliyah by his 22 year absence) everyone mentions only the more important mitzvah (Kibud) for which he was punished, thus subsuming the secondary mitzvah (Aliyah). However, he adds, if parents were living in Israel, and the father decides to pick up and head for the Diaspora, insisting the son leave with him, then here the son may refuse his father's demands and insist on remaining in Israel to fulfill the mitzvah of Aliyah uninterruptedly. Proof? Machlon and Kilyon (of Megilla Rus fame) who followed their father's wishes and left Israel, which eventually ended with their deaths.


However, the final halachah, notwithstanding all the above, is clear: parents cannot prevent their children from fulfilling the mitzvah of Aliyah, and the Rambam includes this in his Hilchos Mamrim, Chapter 6 that even when contravening a mitzvah derabanon, the need for Aliyah outweighs that of Kibud.


* * *


There is a wonderful Meshech Chochmah on the word �Vayikach� in Avraham's taking of Sarah with him. It means he persuaded her with arguments, not that he physically forced her along, for you are not allowed to go and live elsewhere unless your wife agrees to the move. This seems to contravene the Gemara of Ketuvot which holds that you can force your wife to come with you to make Aliyah and even divorce her if she refuses to go along. The Meshech Chochmah resolves this contradiction by telling us that the mitzvah to go and live in Israel applies in Lech Lechah only after G-d says to Avraham "Kum Ve-His-halech" at which moment G-d is allowing Avraham the means to procure Eretz Yisrael by means of kinyan on behalf of all the Jewish people for the future. Until G-d states these words, there is not the mitzvah of Yishuv Eretz Yisrael and therefore Avraham has to persuade Sarah with words. But once this mitzvah originates from G-d's mouth to Avraham, from that time onwards, one can even force one's wife to join you in the mitzvah of Aliyah.


For those of us who have not yet made the mitzvah of Aliyah, hopefully we are all doing everything within our possibilities to support Eretz Yisrael in every and any means within our range so that, even while outside in the Diaspora, we are not neglecting our people in Israel, nor should they feel neglected, by the concerted efforts we are providing on their behalf.


Shabbat Shalom.


NCYI's Weekly Divrei Torah Bulletin is sponsored by the Henry, Bertha and Edward Rothman Foundation - Rochester, New York; Cleveland, Ohio; Circleville, Ohio

To receive a free e-mail subscription to NCYI�s weekly Torah Bulletin, send an email to: YI_Torah@lb.bcentral.com